Engineering and Road Design Considerations
Trees and Clear Zone Constraints
The “clear zone” concept refers to provisions whereby a roadside is free of fixed objects for a sufficient distance away from travel lanes to reduce both the potential and severity of accidents. Guidance on the appropriate clear zone distances is found in the “Roadside Design Guide” manual that is produced by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Although the document points out that it is intended only as a “guide” and not as a standard or design policy, it does present the most current and best practices regarding roadside safety. Overall recommended roadside design criteria relating to the clear zone are as follows:
clear zones

Clear zone distance: The distance required to provide an adequate clear zone is based on three criteria: traffic volume, design speed and slope next to a roadside. Clear zone distances can range from 7 feet for low-volume, low-speed roadways with gentle side slopes to greater than 30 feet for high-volume, high-speed roadways with steeper side slopes (see the chart in Appendix B, outlining clear zones in relation to the criteria). The clear zone distance is measured from the edge of the driving lane, which is not necessarily the edge of pavement, if on-street parking or bicycle lanes are present.

Curbs: The Roadside Design Guide points out that “realistically, a non-mountable curb has only limited redirectional capabilities, and only at low speeds.” Consequently, curbs are not typically considered to be barriers.

Types of vegetation that are allowed: The Roadside Design Guide notes that any single tree with a trunk diameter of greater than 5 inches is considered a fixed object. In addition, a group of shrubs or small trees that are close together can be assumed to have the same effect as a single larger tree.

Safety barriers: There may be situations, particularly where there are high design speeds, where unobtrusive barriers should be considered. Discussion with local engineering departments and the Tennessee Department of Transportation would need to occur to determine what would be acceptable depending on the jurisdictional and functional classification of each roadway. A barrier such as a guardrail should only be considered if it will reduce the severity of potential accidents, since the barrier itself can be considered a roadside hazard, particularly at its terminal end. Aesthetically pleasing barriers should be used. Any proposed barrier must have passed several Federal Highway Administration test procedures in order to be considered crash-worthy. Potential barriers that have aesthetic merit include: (1) the dual cable barriers used along the interstate medians in South Carolina (their “transparency” permits views of the landscaping); and (2) wooden barriers that are used by the National Park Service along its parkways and by Connecticut along the Merritt Parkway.

Considerations in urban environments: The Roadside Design Guide has a separate chapter that deals specifically with urban environments in which it is recognized that roadside design is restricted due to limited right-of-way or dense abutting development. This chapter points out that, while the clear roadside is still the goal of the designer, compromises may be necessary to address various constraints. Engineering judgement often must be used, and determinations of appropriate roadside measures need to be made on a case-by-case basis.

Sight Distance
A major consideration when proposing additional landscaping and trees along a roadside is the maintenance of adequate sight distances. The most critical areas are intersecting roadways where drivers must be able to see each other clearly as well as any pedestrians or other road users. A visual clear zone must be established (often referred to as a “sight-triangle”) at all intersections and that area kept free of obstructions that may inhibit sight distance.